The paper introduces ArabicNumBench, a benchmark for evaluating LLMs on Arabic number reading using both Eastern and Western Arabic numerals. It evaluates 71 models from 10 providers on 210 number reading tasks, using zero-shot, zero-shot CoT, few-shot, and few-shot CoT prompting strategies. The results show substantial performance variation, with few-shot CoT prompting achieving 2.8x higher accuracy than zero-shot approaches. Why it matters: The benchmark establishes baselines for Arabic number comprehension and provides guidance for model selection in production Arabic NLP systems.
The paper introduces ALPS (Arabic Linguistic & Pragmatic Suite), a diagnostic challenge set for evaluating deep semantics and pragmatics in Arabic NLP. The dataset contains 531 expert-curated questions across 15 tasks and 47 subtasks, designed to test morpho-syntactic dependencies and compositional semantics. Evaluation of 23 models, including commercial, open-source, and Arabic-native models, reveals that models struggle with fundamental morpho-syntactic dependencies, especially those reliant on diacritics. Why it matters: ALPS provides a valuable benchmark for evaluating the linguistic competence of Arabic NLP models, highlighting areas where current models fall short despite achieving high fluency.
MBZUAI researchers introduce SocialMaze, a new benchmark for evaluating social reasoning capabilities in large language models (LLMs). SocialMaze includes six diverse tasks across social reasoning games, daily-life interactions, and digital community platforms, emphasizing deep reasoning, dynamic interaction, and information uncertainty. Experiments show that LLMs vary in handling dynamic interactions, degrade under uncertainty, but can be improved via fine-tuning on curated reasoning examples.
MBZUAI researchers release 'Fann or Flop', a new benchmark for evaluating Arabic poetry understanding in LLMs. The benchmark covers 12 historical eras and 14 poetic genres, assessing semantic understanding, metaphor interpretation, and cultural context. Evaluation of state-of-the-art LLMs reveals challenges in poetic understanding despite strong performance on standard Arabic benchmarks.
MBZUAI researchers introduce LLM-BabyBench, a benchmark suite for evaluating grounded planning and reasoning in LLMs. The suite, built on a textual adaptation of the BabyAI grid world, assesses LLMs on predicting action consequences, generating action sequences, and decomposing instructions. Datasets, evaluation harness, and metrics are publicly available to facilitate reproducible assessment.
Researchers introduce Swan, a family of Arabic-centric embedding models including Swan-Small (based on ARBERTv2) and Swan-Large (based on ArMistral). They also propose ArabicMTEB, a benchmark suite for cross-lingual, multi-dialectal Arabic text embedding performance across 8 tasks and 94 datasets. Swan-Large achieves state-of-the-art results, outperforming Multilingual-E5-large in most Arabic tasks. Why it matters: The new models and benchmarks address a critical need for high-quality Arabic language models that are both dialectally and culturally aware, enabling more effective NLP applications in the region.
Researchers introduce AraDiCE, a benchmark for Arabic Dialect and Cultural Evaluation, comprising seven synthetic datasets in various dialects and Modern Standard Arabic (MSA). The benchmark includes approximately 45,000 post-edited samples and evaluates LLMs on dialect comprehension, generation, and cultural awareness across the Gulf, Egypt, and Levant. Results show that Arabic-specific models like Jais and AceGPT outperform multilingual models on dialectal tasks, but challenges remain in dialect identification, generation, and translation. Why it matters: This benchmark and associated datasets will help improve LLMs' ability to understand and generate diverse Arabic dialects and cultural contexts, addressing a significant gap in current models.
Researchers introduce two new benchmarks, derived from the Qiyas exam, to evaluate mathematical reasoning and language understanding in Arabic. They tested ChatGPT-3.5-turbo and ChatGPT-4, which achieved 49% and 64% accuracy respectively. The new benchmarks aim to address the lack of resources for evaluating Arabic language models.
MBZUAI researchers introduce M4GT-Bench, a new benchmark for evaluating machine-generated text (MGT) detection across multiple languages and domains. The benchmark includes tasks for binary MGT detection, identifying the specific model that generated the text, and detecting mixed human-machine text. Experiments with baseline models and human evaluation show that MGT detection performance is highly dependent on access to training data from the same domain and generators.
The paper introduces ORCA, a new public benchmark for evaluating Arabic language understanding. ORCA covers diverse Arabic varieties and includes 60 datasets across seven NLU task clusters. The benchmark was used to compare 18 multilingual and Arabic language models and includes a public leaderboard with a unified evaluation metric. Why it matters: ORCA addresses the lack of a comprehensive Arabic benchmark, enabling better progress measurement for Arabic and multilingual language models.
This paper introduces a novel black-box adversarial attack method, Mixup-Attack, to generate universal adversarial examples for remote sensing data. The method identifies common vulnerabilities in neural networks by attacking features in the shallow layer of a surrogate model. The authors also present UAE-RS, the first dataset of black-box adversarial samples in remote sensing, to benchmark the robustness of deep learning models against adversarial attacks.
MBZUAI researchers won second place at the AgentX Competition at UC Berkeley for their benchmark measuring AI agents' reasoning across images, comparisons, and video. The Agent-X dataset includes 828 tasks across six domains, requiring agents to use 14 executable tools without explicit instructions. Agent-X analyzes the agent's full reasoning trajectory, unlike typical evaluations that focus only on final answers. Why it matters: The benchmark exposes limitations in current multimodal AI agents and provides a more rigorous evaluation framework for real-world applications in the region and beyond.
This paper presents a benchmark study of contrastive learning (CL) methods applied to Arabic social meaning tasks like sentiment analysis and dialect identification. The study compares state-of-the-art supervised CL techniques against vanilla fine-tuning across a range of tasks. Results indicate that CL methods outperform vanilla fine-tuning in most cases and demonstrate data efficiency. Why it matters: This work highlights the potential of contrastive learning for improving performance in Arabic NLP, especially in low-resource scenarios.