MBZUAI researchers introduce SocialMaze, a new benchmark for evaluating social reasoning capabilities in large language models (LLMs). SocialMaze includes six diverse tasks across social reasoning games, daily-life interactions, and digital community platforms, emphasizing deep reasoning, dynamic interaction, and information uncertainty. Experiments show that LLMs vary in handling dynamic interactions, degrade under uncertainty, but can be improved via fine-tuning on curated reasoning examples.
Keywords
social reasoning · large language models · benchmark · SocialMaze · MBZUAI
The paper introduces MIRAGE, a framework for evaluating LLMs' ability to simulate human behaviors in murder mystery games. MIRAGE uses four methods: TII, CIC, ICI and SCI to assess the LLMs' role-playing proficiency. Experiments show that even GPT-4 struggles with the complexities of the MIRAGE framework.
MBZUAI researchers introduce LLM-BabyBench, a benchmark suite for evaluating grounded planning and reasoning in LLMs. The suite, built on a textual adaptation of the BabyAI grid world, assesses LLMs on predicting action consequences, generating action sequences, and decomposing instructions. Datasets, evaluation harness, and metrics are publicly available to facilitate reproducible assessment.
The paper introduces SaudiCulture, a new benchmark for evaluating the cultural competence of LLMs within Saudi Arabia, covering five major geographical regions and diverse cultural domains. The benchmark includes questions of varying complexity and distinguishes between common and specialized regional knowledge. Evaluations of five LLMs (GPT-4, Llama 3.3, FANAR, Jais, and AceGPT) revealed performance declines on region-specific questions, highlighting the need for region-specific knowledge in LLM training.
MBZUAI researchers introduce ARB, the first comprehensive benchmark for evaluating step-by-step multimodal reasoning in Arabic across textual and visual modalities. The benchmark spans 11 diverse domains and includes 1,356 multimodal samples with 5,119 human-curated reasoning steps. Evaluations of 12 state-of-the-art LMMs revealed challenges in coherence, faithfulness, and cultural grounding, highlighting the need for culturally aware AI systems.