arXiv ·
Researchers from the National Center for AI in Saudi Arabia investigated the sensitivity of Large Language Model (LLM) leaderboards to minor benchmark perturbations. They found that small changes, like choice order, can shift rankings by up to 8 positions. The study recommends hybrid scoring and warns against over-reliance on simple benchmark evaluations, providing code for further research.
arXiv ·
Researchers introduce AraDiCE, a benchmark for Arabic Dialect and Cultural Evaluation, comprising seven synthetic datasets in various dialects and Modern Standard Arabic (MSA). The benchmark includes approximately 45,000 post-edited samples and evaluates LLMs on dialect comprehension, generation, and cultural awareness across the Gulf, Egypt, and Levant. Results show that Arabic-specific models like Jais and AceGPT outperform multilingual models on dialectal tasks, but challenges remain in dialect identification, generation, and translation. Why it matters: This benchmark and associated datasets will help improve LLMs' ability to understand and generate diverse Arabic dialects and cultural contexts, addressing a significant gap in current models.
arXiv ·
The paper introduces ArabicNumBench, a benchmark for evaluating LLMs on Arabic number reading using both Eastern and Western Arabic numerals. It evaluates 71 models from 10 providers on 210 number reading tasks, using zero-shot, zero-shot CoT, few-shot, and few-shot CoT prompting strategies. The results show substantial performance variation, with few-shot CoT prompting achieving 2.8x higher accuracy than zero-shot approaches. Why it matters: The benchmark establishes baselines for Arabic number comprehension and provides guidance for model selection in production Arabic NLP systems.
arXiv ·
This paper benchmarks reasoning-focused LLMs, especially DeepSeek models, on fifteen Arabic NLP tasks. The study uses zero-shot, few-shot, and fine-tuning strategies. Key findings include that three in-context examples improve F1 scores by over 13 points on classification tasks, DeepSeek outperforms GPT-4-mini by 12 F1 points on complex inference tasks in the zero-shot setting, and LoRA fine-tuning yields up to an additional 8 points in F1 and BLEU. Why it matters: The systematic evaluation provides insights into the performance of LLMs on Arabic NLP, highlighting the effectiveness of different strategies for improving performance and contributing to the development of more capable Arabic language models.
arXiv ·
Researchers introduce Swan, a family of Arabic-centric embedding models including Swan-Small (based on ARBERTv2) and Swan-Large (based on ArMistral). They also propose ArabicMTEB, a benchmark suite for cross-lingual, multi-dialectal Arabic text embedding performance across 8 tasks and 94 datasets. Swan-Large achieves state-of-the-art results, outperforming Multilingual-E5-large in most Arabic tasks. Why it matters: The new models and benchmarks address a critical need for high-quality Arabic language models that are both dialectally and culturally aware, enabling more effective NLP applications in the region.
arXiv ·
Researchers introduce two new benchmarks, derived from the Qiyas exam, to evaluate mathematical reasoning and language understanding in Arabic. They tested ChatGPT-3.5-turbo and ChatGPT-4, which achieved 49% and 64% accuracy respectively. The new benchmarks aim to address the lack of resources for evaluating Arabic language models.
arXiv ·
The paper introduces ORCA, a new public benchmark for evaluating Arabic language understanding. ORCA covers diverse Arabic varieties and includes 60 datasets across seven NLU task clusters. The benchmark was used to compare 18 multilingual and Arabic language models and includes a public leaderboard with a unified evaluation metric. Why it matters: ORCA addresses the lack of a comprehensive Arabic benchmark, enabling better progress measurement for Arabic and multilingual language models.