Justice Connect, an Australian charity, collaborated with MBZUAI's Prof. Timothy Baldwin to improve their legal intake tool using NLP. The tool helps route legal requests, but users struggled to identify the relevant area of law, leading to delays and frustration. By applying NLP, the collaboration aims to help users more easily navigate the tool and access appropriate legal resources. Why it matters: This project demonstrates how NLP can be applied to improve access to justice and address unmet legal needs, particularly for those unfamiliar with legal terminology.
This paper introduces a Regulatory Knowledge Graph (RKG) for the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) regulations, constructed using language models and graph technologies. A portion of the regulations was manually tagged to train BERT-based models, which were then applied to the rest of the corpus. The resulting knowledge graph, stored in Neo4j, and code are open-sourced on GitHub to promote advancements in compliance automation.
A partner at Oblon, Stefan Uwe Koschmieder, explained key points for patenting software and AI inventions. Koschmieder works with GCC universities on IP programs and advises foreign clients on IP portfolio management. He also lectured at Freie Universität Berlin on Intellectual Property. Why it matters: As software and AI innovation grows in the GCC, understanding patent law is increasingly important for protecting intellectual property and fostering local innovation.
Researchers introduce a new task for generating question-passage pairs to aid in developing regulatory question-answering (QA) systems. The ObliQA dataset, comprising 27,869 questions from Abu Dhabi Global Markets (ADGM) financial regulations, is presented. A baseline Regulatory Information Retrieval and Answer Generation (RIRAG) system is designed and evaluated using the RePASs metric.
This paper introduces a predictive analysis of Arabic court decisions, utilizing 10,813 real commercial court cases. The study evaluates LLaMA-7b, JAIS-13b, and GPT3.5-turbo models under zero-shot, one-shot, and fine-tuned training paradigms, also experimenting with summarization and translation. GPT-3.5 models significantly outperformed others, exceeding JAIS model performance by 50%, while also demonstrating the unreliability of most automated metrics. Why it matters: This research bridges computational linguistics and Arabic legal analytics, offering insights for enhancing judicial processes and legal strategies in the Arabic-speaking world.
Researchers introduce ArabLegalEval, a multitask benchmark dataset for assessing Arabic legal knowledge in LLMs. The dataset contains tasks sourced from Saudi legal documents and synthesized questions, drawing inspiration from MMLU and LegalBench. Experiments benchmarked models including GPT-4 and Jais, exploring in-context learning and various evaluation methods. Why it matters: This resource should help accelerate AI research and evaluation in the Arabic legal domain, where datasets are lacking.
The paper introduces a benchmark of 1,000 multiple-choice questions to evaluate LLMs on Islamic inheritance law ('ilm al-mawarith). Seven LLMs were tested, with o3 and Gemini 2.5 achieving over 90% accuracy, while ALLaM, Fanar, LLaMA, and Mistral scored below 50%. Error analysis revealed limitations in handling structured legal reasoning. Why it matters: This research highlights the challenges and opportunities for adapting LLMs to complex, culturally-specific legal domains like Islamic jurisprudence.