Skip to content
GCC AI Research

Assessing Large Language Models on Islamic Legal Reasoning: Evidence from Inheritance Law Evaluation

arXiv · · Notable

Summary

The paper introduces a benchmark of 1,000 multiple-choice questions to evaluate LLMs on Islamic inheritance law ('ilm al-mawarith). Seven LLMs were tested, with o3 and Gemini 2.5 achieving over 90% accuracy, while ALLaM, Fanar, LLaMA, and Mistral scored below 50%. Error analysis revealed limitations in handling structured legal reasoning. Why it matters: This research highlights the challenges and opportunities for adapting LLMs to complex, culturally-specific legal domains like Islamic jurisprudence.

Get the weekly digest

Top AI stories from the GCC region, every week.

Related

ALARB: An Arabic Legal Argument Reasoning Benchmark

arXiv ·

Researchers introduce ALARB, a new benchmark for evaluating reasoning in Arabic LLMs using 13K Saudi commercial court cases. The benchmark includes tasks like verdict prediction, reasoning chain completion, and identification of relevant regulations. Instruction-tuning a 12B parameter model on ALARB achieves performance comparable to GPT-4o in verdict prediction and generation.

QU-NLP at QIAS 2025 Shared Task: A Two-Phase LLM Fine-Tuning and Retrieval-Augmented Generation Approach for Islamic Inheritance Reasoning

arXiv ·

The QU-NLP team presented their approach to the QIAS 2025 shared task on Islamic Inheritance Reasoning, fine-tuning the Fanar-1-9B model using LoRA and integrating it into a RAG pipeline. Their system achieved an accuracy of 0.858 on the final test, outperforming models like GPT 4.5, LLaMA, and Mistral in zero-shot settings. The system particularly excelled in advanced reasoning, achieving 97.6% accuracy. Why it matters: This demonstrates the effectiveness of domain-specific fine-tuning and retrieval augmentation for Arabic LLMs in complex reasoning tasks, even surpassing frontier models.