A new methodology emulating fact-checker criteria assesses news outlet factuality and bias using LLMs. The approach uses prompts based on fact-checking criteria to elicit and aggregate LLM responses for predictions. Experiments demonstrate improvements over baselines, with error analysis on media popularity and region, and a released dataset/code at https://github.com/mbzuai-nlp/llm-media-profiling.
Researchers introduce a benchmark to evaluate the factual recall and knowledge transferability of multilingual language models across 13 languages. The study reveals that language models often fail to transfer knowledge between languages, even when they possess the correct information in one language. The benchmark and evaluation framework are released to drive future research in multilingual knowledge transfer.
MBZUAI researchers release OpenFactCheck, a unified framework to evaluate the factual accuracy of large language models. The framework includes modules for response evaluation, LLM evaluation, and fact-checker evaluation. OpenFactCheck is available as an open-source Python library, a web service, and via GitHub.
Muhammad Arslan Manzoor became MBZUAI's first NLP Ph.D. graduate, focusing his research on media bias under Professor Preslav Nakov. His thesis, 'MGM,' explored using audience overlap graphs to predict the factuality and bias of news media, an approach that differs from traditional textual analysis. Manzoor's work aims to improve the efficiency of media profiling in real-time by leveraging relationships captured in media graphs. Why it matters: This research offers innovative methods for identifying bias in news, which is crucial for promoting informed social discourse and combating disinformation in the region.
MBZUAI researchers presented new resources at EMNLP for improving the factuality of LLMs, including a web application for fact-checking LLM-generated text and benchmarks for evaluating automated fact-checkers. They found that current automated fact-checkers miss nearly 40% of false claims generated by LLMs. The study breaks down the fact-checking process into eight tasks, including decomposition and decontextualization, to identify where systems fail. Why it matters: This work addresses a critical challenge in the deployment of LLMs by providing tools and methods for improving their reliability and trustworthiness, which is essential for widespread adoption in sensitive applications.