Skip to content
GCC AI Research

Search

Results for "decision tree"

Climate-based Pre-screening of Self-sustaining Regreening Opportunities in Drylands: A Case Study for Saudi Arabia

arXiv ·

Researchers have developed a scalable pre-screening framework that integrates climate and remote sensing data to identify cost-efficient sites for sustainable dryland restoration, using Saudi Arabia as a case study. The framework employs machine learning models to derive a Climate Suitability Score (CSS), which captures climatic dependencies on vegetation persistence. National-scale prediction maps were generated using multi-year ERA5-Land data for Saudi Arabia, leading to the identification of thirteen priority locations with an estimated potential for a 2.5-fold increase in vegetation coverage. Why it matters: This approach significantly reduces the search space and costs associated with restoration efforts, supporting more resilient and sustainable ecosystem recovery planning in water-limited regions of the Middle East.

Rational Counterfactuals

arXiv ·

This paper introduces rational counterfactuals, a method for identifying counterfactuals that maximize the attainment of a desired consequent. The approach aims to identify the antecedent that leads to a specific outcome for rational decision-making. The theory is applied to identify variable values that contribute to peace, such as Allies, Contingency, Distance, Major Power, Capability, Democracy, and Economic Interdependency. Why it matters: The research provides a framework for analyzing and promoting conditions conducive to peace using counterfactual reasoning.

Mosques Smart Domes System using Machine Learning Algorithms

arXiv ·

This paper proposes a smart dome system for mosques that uses machine learning to automatically control dome ventilation based on weather conditions and outside temperatures. The system was tested on the Prophet Mosque in Saudi Arabia using K-Nearest Neighbors and Decision Tree algorithms. The Decision Tree algorithm achieved a higher accuracy of 98% compared to 95% for the k-NN algorithm.