Skip to content
GCC AI Research

Search

Results for "Harmful language"

UnsafeChain: Enhancing Reasoning Model Safety via Hard Cases

arXiv ·

Researchers introduce UnsafeChain, a new safety alignment dataset designed to improve the safety of large reasoning models (LRMs) by focusing on 'hard prompts' that elicit harmful outputs. The dataset identifies and corrects unsafe completions into safe responses, exposing models to unsafe behaviors and guiding their correction. Fine-tuning LRMs on UnsafeChain demonstrates enhanced safety and preservation of general reasoning ability compared to existing datasets like SafeChain and STAR-1.

Overview of Abusive and Threatening Language Detection in Urdu at FIRE 2021

arXiv ·

This paper introduces two shared tasks for abusive and threatening language detection in Urdu, a low-resource language with over 170 million speakers. The tasks involve binary classification of Urdu tweets into Abusive/Non-Abusive and Threatening/Non-Threatening categories, respectively. Datasets of 2400/6000 training tweets and 1100/3950 testing tweets were created and manually annotated, along with logistic regression and BERT-based baselines. 21 teams participated and the best systems achieved F1-scores of 0.880 and 0.545 on the abusive and threatening language tasks, respectively, with m-BERT showing the best performance.

Towards Real-world Fact-Checking with Large Language Models

MBZUAI ·

Iryna Gurevych from TU Darmstadt presented research on using large language models for real-world fact-checking, focusing on dismantling misleading narratives from misinterpreted scientific publications and detecting misinformation via visual content. The research aims to explain why a false claim was believed, why it is false, and why the alternative is correct. Why it matters: Addressing misinformation, especially when supported by seemingly credible sources, is critical for public health, conflict resolution, and maintaining trust in institutions in the Middle East and globally.

How secure is AI-generated Code: A Large-Scale Comparison of Large Language Models

arXiv ·

A study compared the vulnerability of C programs generated by nine state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs) using a zero-shot prompt. The researchers introduced FormAI-v2, a dataset of 331,000 C programs generated by these LLMs, and found that at least 62.07% of the generated programs contained vulnerabilities, detected via formal verification. The research highlights the need for risk assessment and validation when deploying LLM-generated code in production environments.