Skip to content
GCC AI Research

Search

Results for "AraHalluEval"

AraHalluEval: A Fine-grained Hallucination Evaluation Framework for Arabic LLMs

arXiv ·

The paper introduces AraHalluEval, a new framework for evaluating hallucinations in Arabic and multilingual large language models (LLMs). The framework uses 12 fine-grained hallucination indicators across generative question answering and summarization tasks, evaluating 12 LLMs including Arabic-specific, multilingual, and reasoning-based models. Results show factual hallucinations are more common than faithfulness errors, with the Arabic model Allam showing lower hallucination rates. Why it matters: This work addresses a critical gap in Arabic NLP by providing a comprehensive tool for assessing and mitigating hallucination in LLMs, which is essential for reliable AI applications in the Arabic-speaking world.

Ara-HOPE: Human-Centric Post-Editing Evaluation for Dialectal Arabic to Modern Standard Arabic Translation

arXiv ·

The paper introduces Ara-HOPE, a human-centric post-editing evaluation framework for Dialectal Arabic to Modern Standard Arabic (DA-MSA) translation. Ara-HOPE includes a five-category error taxonomy and a decision-tree annotation protocol designed to address the challenges of dialect-specific MT errors. Evaluation of Jais, GPT-3.5, and NLLB-200 shows dialect-specific terminology and semantic preservation remain key challenges. Why it matters: The new framework and public dataset will help improve the evaluation and development of dialect-aware MT systems for Arabic.

AraTrust: An Evaluation of Trustworthiness for LLMs in Arabic

arXiv ·

The paper introduces AraTrust, a new benchmark for evaluating the trustworthiness of LLMs when prompted in Arabic. The benchmark contains 522 multiple-choice questions covering dimensions like truthfulness, ethics, safety, and fairness. Experiments using AraTrust showed that GPT-4 performed the best, while open-source models like AceGPT 7B and Jais 13B had lower scores. Why it matters: This benchmark addresses a critical gap in evaluating LLMs for Arabic, which is essential for ensuring the safe and ethical deployment of AI in the Arab world.

GPTAraEval: A Comprehensive Evaluation of ChatGPT on Arabic NLP

arXiv ·

This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of ChatGPT's performance across 44 Arabic NLP tasks using over 60 datasets. The study compares ChatGPT's capabilities in Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) and Dialectal Arabic (DA) against smaller, fine-tuned models. Results show ChatGPT is outperformed by smaller, fine-tuned models and exhibits limitations in handling Arabic dialects compared to MSA. Why it matters: The work highlights the need for further research and development of Arabic-specific NLP models to overcome the limitations of general-purpose models like ChatGPT.

UI-Level Evaluation of ALLaM 34B: Measuring an Arabic-Centric LLM via HUMAIN Chat

arXiv ·

This paper presents a UI-level evaluation of ALLaM-34B, an Arabic-centric LLM developed by SDAIA and deployed in the HUMAIN Chat service. The evaluation used a prompt pack spanning various Arabic dialects, code-switching, reasoning, and safety, with outputs scored by frontier LLM judges. Results indicate strong performance in generation, code-switching, MSA handling, reasoning, and improved dialect fidelity, positioning ALLaM-34B as a robust Arabic LLM suitable for real-world use.

AraReasoner: Evaluating Reasoning-Based LLMs for Arabic NLP

arXiv ·

This paper benchmarks reasoning-focused LLMs, especially DeepSeek models, on fifteen Arabic NLP tasks. The study uses zero-shot, few-shot, and fine-tuning strategies. Key findings include that three in-context examples improve F1 scores by over 13 points on classification tasks, DeepSeek outperforms GPT-4-mini by 12 F1 points on complex inference tasks in the zero-shot setting, and LoRA fine-tuning yields up to an additional 8 points in F1 and BLEU. Why it matters: The systematic evaluation provides insights into the performance of LLMs on Arabic NLP, highlighting the effectiveness of different strategies for improving performance and contributing to the development of more capable Arabic language models.

How well can LLMs Grade Essays in Arabic?

arXiv ·

This research evaluates LLMs like ChatGPT, Llama, Aya, Jais, and ACEGPT on Arabic automated essay scoring (AES) using the AR-AES dataset. The study uses zero-shot, few-shot learning, and fine-tuning approaches while using a mixed-language prompting strategy. ACEGPT performed best among the LLMs with a QWK of 0.67, while a smaller BERT model achieved 0.88. Why it matters: The study highlights challenges faced by LLMs in processing Arabic and provides insights into improving LLM performance in Arabic NLP tasks.