MBZUAI researchers introduce ARB, the first comprehensive benchmark for evaluating step-by-step multimodal reasoning in Arabic across textual and visual modalities. The benchmark spans 11 diverse domains and includes 1,356 multimodal samples with 5,119 human-curated reasoning steps. Evaluations of 12 state-of-the-art LMMs revealed challenges in coherence, faithfulness, and cultural grounding, highlighting the need for culturally aware AI systems.
A new benchmark, ViMUL-Bench, is introduced to evaluate video LLMs across 14 languages, including Arabic, with a focus on cultural inclusivity. The benchmark includes 8k manually verified samples across 15 categories and varying video durations. A multilingual video LLM, ViMUL, is also presented, along with a training set of 1.2 million samples, with both to be publicly released.
Researchers introduce ALARB, a new benchmark for evaluating reasoning in Arabic LLMs using 13K Saudi commercial court cases. The benchmark includes tasks like verdict prediction, reasoning chain completion, and identification of relevant regulations. Instruction-tuning a 12B parameter model on ALARB achieves performance comparable to GPT-4o in verdict prediction and generation.
A new benchmark, LongShOTBench, is introduced for evaluating multimodal reasoning and tool use in long videos, featuring open-ended questions and diagnostic rubrics. The benchmark addresses the limitations of existing datasets by combining temporal length and multimodal richness, using human-validated samples. LongShOTAgent, an agentic system, is also presented for analyzing long videos, with both the benchmark and agent demonstrating the challenges faced by state-of-the-art MLLMs.
MBZUAI introduces Agent-X, a benchmark for evaluating multi-step reasoning in vision-centric agents across real-world, multimodal settings. Agent-X includes 828 tasks with diverse visual contexts and spans six environments, requiring tool use and stepwise decision-making. Experiments show that current LLMs struggle with multi-step vision tasks, achieving less than 50% success, highlighting areas for improvement in LMM reasoning and tool use.