Skip to content
GCC AI Research

When Benchmarks are Targets: Revealing the Sensitivity of Large Language Model Leaderboards

arXiv · · Significant research

Summary

Researchers from the National Center for AI in Saudi Arabia investigated the sensitivity of Large Language Model (LLM) leaderboards to minor benchmark perturbations. They found that small changes, like choice order, can shift rankings by up to 8 positions. The study recommends hybrid scoring and warns against over-reliance on simple benchmark evaluations, providing code for further research.

Get the weekly digest

Top AI stories from the GCC region, every week.

Related

Data Laundering: Artificially Boosting Benchmark Results through Knowledge Distillation

arXiv ·

Researchers at MBZUAI have demonstrated a method called "Data Laundering" to artificially boost language model benchmark scores using knowledge distillation. The technique covertly transfers benchmark-specific knowledge, leading to inflated accuracy without genuine improvements in reasoning. The study highlights a vulnerability in current AI evaluation practices and calls for more robust benchmarks.

LAraBench: Benchmarking Arabic AI with Large Language Models

arXiv ·

LAraBench introduces a benchmark for Arabic NLP and speech processing, evaluating LLMs like GPT-3.5-turbo, GPT-4, BLOOMZ, Jais-13b-chat, Whisper, and USM. The benchmark covers 33 tasks across 61 datasets, using zero-shot and few-shot learning techniques. Results show that SOTA models generally outperform LLMs in zero-shot settings, though larger LLMs with few-shot learning reduce the gap. Why it matters: This benchmark helps assess and improve the performance of LLMs on Arabic language tasks, highlighting areas where specialized models still excel.

Evaluating Arabic Large Language Models: A Survey of Benchmarks, Methods, and Gaps

arXiv ·

This survey paper analyzes over 40 benchmarks used to evaluate Arabic large language models, categorizing them into Knowledge, NLP Tasks, Culture and Dialects, and Target-Specific evaluations. It identifies progress in benchmark diversity but also highlights gaps like limited temporal evaluation and cultural misalignment. The paper also examines methods for creating benchmarks, including native collection, translation, and synthetic generation. Why it matters: The survey provides a comprehensive reference for Arabic NLP research and offers recommendations for future benchmark development to better align with cultural contexts.

LLMeBench: A Flexible Framework for Accelerating LLMs Benchmarking

arXiv ·

Researchers have introduced LLMeBench, a customizable framework for evaluating large language models (LLMs) across diverse NLP tasks and languages. The framework features generic dataset loaders, multiple model providers, and pre-implemented evaluation metrics, supporting in-context learning with zero- and few-shot settings. LLMeBench was tested on 31 unique NLP tasks using 53 datasets across 90 experimental setups with 296K data points, and the code has been open-sourced. Why it matters: The framework's flexibility and ease of customization should accelerate LLM benchmarking, especially for Arabic and other low-resource languages.