LAraBench introduces a benchmark for Arabic NLP and speech processing, evaluating LLMs like GPT-3.5-turbo, GPT-4, BLOOMZ, Jais-13b-chat, Whisper, and USM. The benchmark covers 33 tasks across 61 datasets, using zero-shot and few-shot learning techniques. Results show that SOTA models generally outperform LLMs in zero-shot settings, though larger LLMs with few-shot learning reduce the gap. Why it matters: This benchmark helps assess and improve the performance of LLMs on Arabic language tasks, highlighting areas where specialized models still excel.
This paper benchmarks reasoning-focused LLMs, especially DeepSeek models, on fifteen Arabic NLP tasks. The study uses zero-shot, few-shot, and fine-tuning strategies. Key findings include that three in-context examples improve F1 scores by over 13 points on classification tasks, DeepSeek outperforms GPT-4-mini by 12 F1 points on complex inference tasks in the zero-shot setting, and LoRA fine-tuning yields up to an additional 8 points in F1 and BLEU. Why it matters: The systematic evaluation provides insights into the performance of LLMs on Arabic NLP, highlighting the effectiveness of different strategies for improving performance and contributing to the development of more capable Arabic language models.
The paper introduces SalamahBench, a new benchmark for evaluating the safety of Arabic Language Models (ALMs). The benchmark comprises 8,170 prompts across 12 categories aligned with the MLCommons Safety Hazard Taxonomy. Five state-of-the-art ALMs, including Fanar 1 and 2, ALLaM 2, Falcon H1R, and Jais 2, were evaluated using the benchmark. Why it matters: The benchmark enables standardized, category-aware safety evaluation, highlighting the necessity of specialized safeguard mechanisms for robust harm mitigation in ALMs.
This survey paper analyzes over 40 benchmarks used to evaluate Arabic large language models, categorizing them into Knowledge, NLP Tasks, Culture and Dialects, and Target-Specific evaluations. It identifies progress in benchmark diversity but also highlights gaps like limited temporal evaluation and cultural misalignment. The paper also examines methods for creating benchmarks, including native collection, translation, and synthetic generation. Why it matters: The survey provides a comprehensive reference for Arabic NLP research and offers recommendations for future benchmark development to better align with cultural contexts.