This research explores the use of generative AI, specifically ChatGPT, to create student assessments that align with academic accreditation standards, such as those of the National Center for Academic Accreditation in Saudi Arabia and ABET. The study introduces a method for mapping verbs used in questions to educational outcomes, enabling AI to produce and validate accreditation-compliant questions. A survey of faculty members in Saudi universities showed high acceptance rates for AI-generated exam questions and AI assistance in editing existing questions.
This paper introduces an AI framework for autonomous assessment of student work, addressing policy gaps in academic practices. A survey of 117 academics from the UK, UAE, and Iraq reveals positive attitudes toward AI in education, particularly for autonomous assessment. The study also highlights a lack of awareness of modern AI tools among experienced academics, emphasizing the need for updated policies and training.
Researchers introduce two new benchmarks, derived from the Qiyas exam, to evaluate mathematical reasoning and language understanding in Arabic. They tested ChatGPT-3.5-turbo and ChatGPT-4, which achieved 49% and 64% accuracy respectively. The new benchmarks aim to address the lack of resources for evaluating Arabic language models.
Researchers proposed a four-stage NLP framework combining schema-constrained LLM extraction, Sentence-BERT (SBERT) alignment with ESCO, an adjudication protocol, and a verification mechanism for curriculum-labor market alignment. The framework was instantiated for the ABET-accredited BSc Computer Science program at the United Arab Emirates University (UAEU), extracting 400 competency records from the study plan and aligning them with 30 job postings. The extractor achieved a Cohen's kappa of 0.79 on the skill slot and surfaced interpretable supply-demand gaps in general, transversal, algorithms, and software engineering skills, with a minimal gap in AI and data science. Why it matters: This framework provides a robust, NLP-driven method to identify crucial skill gaps in higher education curricula, directly supporting quality assurance and workforce development initiatives in the region.