This paper introduces a novel evaluation framework for Arabic language models, addressing gaps in linguistic accuracy and cultural alignment. The authors analyze existing datasets and present the Arabic Depth Mini Dataset (ADMD), a curated collection of 490 questions across ten domains. Evaluating GPT-4, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Gemini Flash 1.5, CommandR 100B, and Qwen-Max using ADMD reveals performance variations, with Claude 3.5 Sonnet achieving the highest accuracy at 30%. Why it matters: The work emphasizes the importance of cultural competence in Arabic language model evaluation, providing practical insights for improvement.
This survey paper analyzes over 40 benchmarks used to evaluate Arabic large language models, categorizing them into Knowledge, NLP Tasks, Culture and Dialects, and Target-Specific evaluations. It identifies progress in benchmark diversity but also highlights gaps like limited temporal evaluation and cultural misalignment. The paper also examines methods for creating benchmarks, including native collection, translation, and synthetic generation. Why it matters: The survey provides a comprehensive reference for Arabic NLP research and offers recommendations for future benchmark development to better align with cultural contexts.
The paper introduces SalamahBench, a new benchmark for evaluating the safety of Arabic Language Models (ALMs). The benchmark comprises 8,170 prompts across 12 categories aligned with the MLCommons Safety Hazard Taxonomy. Five state-of-the-art ALMs, including Fanar 1 and 2, ALLaM 2, Falcon H1R, and Jais 2, were evaluated using the benchmark. Why it matters: The benchmark enables standardized, category-aware safety evaluation, highlighting the necessity of specialized safeguard mechanisms for robust harm mitigation in ALMs.
LAraBench introduces a benchmark for Arabic NLP and speech processing, evaluating LLMs like GPT-3.5-turbo, GPT-4, BLOOMZ, Jais-13b-chat, Whisper, and USM. The benchmark covers 33 tasks across 61 datasets, using zero-shot and few-shot learning techniques. Results show that SOTA models generally outperform LLMs in zero-shot settings, though larger LLMs with few-shot learning reduce the gap. Why it matters: This benchmark helps assess and improve the performance of LLMs on Arabic language tasks, highlighting areas where specialized models still excel.