This paper introduces ProgramFC, a fact-checking model that decomposes complex claims into simpler sub-tasks using a library of functions. The model uses LLMs to generate reasoning programs and executes them by delegating sub-tasks, enhancing explainability and data efficiency. Experiments on fact-checking datasets demonstrate ProgramFC's superior performance compared to baseline methods, with publicly available code and data.
A novel agent-based framework called FIRE is introduced for fact-checking long-form text. FIRE iteratively integrates evidence retrieval and claim verification, deciding whether to provide a final answer or generate a subsequent search query. Experiments show FIRE achieves comparable performance to existing methods while reducing LLM costs by 7.6x and search costs by 16.5x.
A new methodology emulating fact-checker criteria assesses news outlet factuality and bias using LLMs. The approach uses prompts based on fact-checking criteria to elicit and aggregate LLM responses for predictions. Experiments demonstrate improvements over baselines, with error analysis on media popularity and region, and a released dataset/code at https://github.com/mbzuai-nlp/llm-media-profiling.
Researchers at MBZUAI have introduced QRAFT, an LLM-based framework designed to automate the generation of fact-checking articles. The system mimics the writing workflow of human fact-checkers, aiming to bridge the gap between automated fact-checking systems and public dissemination. While QRAFT outperforms existing text-generation methods, it still falls short of expert-written articles, highlighting areas for further research.
The paper introduces Guided Deep List, a tool for automating the generation of epidemiological line lists from open source reports. The tool uses distributed vector representations and dependency parsing to extract tabular data on disease outbreaks. It was evaluated on MERS outbreak data in Saudi Arabia, demonstrating improved accuracy over baseline methods and enabling epidemiological inferences.